Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM Sites in a box

date posted 1st November 2000 13:37

I think a modular construction of e-businesses will apply just as much to
medium and large companies as it will to smaller companies. Maye even more
so.

I'm taking this view because of the changes I see happening in the ASP
(application service provider) world. Once fashionable, and now out of
fashion, they are currently returning with a new twist: instead of
supplying the application software, they are providing the services that
the applications are designed for. In other words, these new style ASPs
won't supply the software to the client at all - only the service functions
it can provide.

This has massive advantages for companies. They do not have to train people
to understand the software. They do not have to run the risk of having
expert employees (who they depend upon to run the software) leaving the
company. If they decide to change to a different type of system they will
have no major costs or disruptions.

This is having the effect of fragmenting companies so that they become
associations of collaborating smaller companies controlled by a nerve
center which is the core business massively downsized. This makes them
highly adaptive and able to cope quickly at relatively small cost to
competitive and technological changes.

In this way, Web sites will come not as components consisting of software
designs, but, in the form several small specialist companies that not only
provide the components of Web site design but are responsible for their
hosting, continual operation and continuous development and evolution. The
Web site will be like a rented living organism that is highly flexible and
adaptive.

This is not maybe, this is happening right now. Take a look at the plans
Microsoft announced in July regarding their intended massive future
investment in the ASP market.

peter









>It is funny this thread should have appeared today, because I am spending
>today learning the inner workings of Actinic Business. The problem I have
>with these products is two fold. 1) They make it very difficult to
>customise, not impossible but they all use custom taging which can be a
>bugger to understand. 2) They are restrictive, for instance in Actinic
>Business although you can have multiple price bands for diffrent customers
>you can not remove certain items so certain customers can see certain items.
>
>I do agree with Peter for small business this is the way it will go, but for
>medium and larger companies they will still require custom sites to enable
>them to do what they want (or maybe there will be bolt on additions to the
>software to enable certain aspects to be done by the software, so you can
>add what functionality you need to your own site).
>
>Morgan
>
>
>
>============================================================
>
> * Free listing for freelancers
> * Free to advertise jobs
> * Free jobs distribution service
> * Free database of 1000 freelancers
>
>Freelancers and Freelance Jobs
>http://www.freelancers.net
>
>To post to the Forum:
[EMAIL REMOVED]
>
>To unsubscribe please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]
>
>If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]
>
>To subscribe to the digest for this list or for further information please
>visit:
>http://www.freelancers.net/forum.html





Messages by Day
November 30th 2000
November 29th 2000
November 28th 2000
November 27th 2000
November 26th 2000
November 25th 2000
November 24th 2000
November 23rd 2000
November 22nd 2000
November 21st 2000
November 20th 2000
November 19th 2000
November 18th 2000
November 17th 2000
November 16th 2000
November 15th 2000
November 14th 2000
November 13th 2000
November 12th 2000
November 11th 2000
November 10th 2000
November 9th 2000
November 8th 2000
November 7th 2000
November 6th 2000
November 5th 2000
November 4th 2000
November 3rd 2000
November 2nd 2000
November 1st 2000


Messages by Month
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000