|
|
 |
Re: FN-FORUM panoramic views
date posted 4th July 2001 10:23
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C10473.09306040
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The thing to keep in mind is the type of lens used.
If you have a lot of depth-of-field where perspectives plays a big role =
in your scene, the lines tend to bend and matching it will take hours, =
sometimes days.
It's good fun though.
Take a look at this: =
http://www.tripletechnology.com/photo/series-print.jpg
Taken in a small room, the camera was exceptionally close to the =
equipment and it took about 16 pictures to make it up. And it is not =
even a full panoramic view. (Oh, and by the way, those are some of my =
toys :) )
I suppose it's worth trying to use a 'panoramic' camera. Some cheap ones =
are available these days, but you will find you can only use a certain % =
of your wide picture anyway.
Well that's my 2p's worth
HTH
Cheers
Willie Jordaan
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Kerry dzinezone=20
To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:46 AM
Subject: RE: FN-FORUM panoramic views
I tried out quite a few of the packages on offer and settled for =
PixMaker from Pixaround http://www.pixaround.com/index.asp It seemed =
(to me at least) the simplest to use and the price was good.
If you go to www.zdnet.com and run a search in their software / free =
downloads there are various packages that do panoramas (360 or =
otherwise) and most of them have evaluations for free ownload.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] =
[EMAIL REMOVED] Behalf Of Rob Garbutt
Sent: 04 July 2001 09:21
To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: FN-FORUM panoramic views
Can anyone recommend some software that joins several photos =
together to form a VR360? What's the best around at the moment?
tia
Robin Garbutt
Portfolio Art & Design Ltd
Tel - +44 (0) 1204 383822
Fax - +44 (0) 1204 383866
Mob - +44 (0) 7811 185490
e-mail - [EMAIL REMOVED]
For further information please visit us at :-
www.portfoliodesign.net
The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of =
the
e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be privileged. =
If you
are not the addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, =
disclose or
otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever. If you =
have
received this e-mail in error please e-mail the sender.
------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C10473.09306040
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The thing to keep in mind is the type =
of lens=20
used.
If you have a lot of depth-of-field =
where=20
perspectives plays a big role in your scene, the lines tend to bend and =
matching=20
it will take hours, sometimes days.
It's good fun though.
Take a look at this: http://ww=
w.tripletechnology.com/photo/series-print.jpg
Taken in a small room, the camera was =
exceptionally=20
close to the equipment and it took about 16 pictures to make it up. And =
it is=20
not even a full panoramic view. (Oh, and by the way, those are some of =
my toys=20
:) )
I suppose it's worth trying to use a =
'panoramic'=20
camera. Some cheap ones are available these days, but you will find you =
can only=20
use a certain % of your wide picture anyway.
Well that's my 2p's worth
HTH
Cheers
Willie Jordaan
----- Original Message -----
From:=20
|
|
|
