Re: FN-FORUM OT: Threading

date posted 17th January 2002 18:56

Darren Beale wrote:


>
> test: sending this @ 1.58PM GMT
>

Arrived with me ~ 18:23 delayed over 4 hours

Here are the headers from your message with calculated
Delays inserted. It's bizzare that there are so many hops
(reminds me of the days of uucp). Problem now looks to
be with both i-way.net.uk and vianw.net



Received: from he101war.uk.vianw.net ([195.102.249.208])
by praseodumium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16RHCA-00021r-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:23:26 +0000
Delay 1h 9m
Received: from [212.49.195.98] (helo=metro.i-way.net.uk)
by he101war.uk.vianw.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
id 16RG79-0004XQ-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:14:11 +0000
Delay -1m 40s
( don't these people run ntp ? )
Received: (from [EMAIL REMOVED]
by metro.i-way.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA21818
for freelancers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:15:51 GMT
Delay 2s
X-Authentication-Warning: metro.i-way.net.uk: mail set sender to
[EMAIL REMOVED] using -f
Received: from mx0.i-way.net.uk (mx0.i-way.net.uk [212.49.192.2])
by metro.i-way.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21811
for [EMAIL REMOVED] Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:15:49 GMT
Delay 3h 9m
Received: from smtp-relay.sb.dsvr.net (sb1.ho.dsvr.net [212.69.222.8])
by mx0.i-way.net.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g0HE6dl30848
for [EMAIL REMOVED] Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:06:51 GMT
Delay 9m
Received: from [212.69.194.173] (helo=pangaea.dsvr.co.uk)
by smtp-relay.sb.dsvr.net with esmtp (Exim 3.11 #2)
id 16RD2S-0001Jl-00
for [EMAIL REMOVED] Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:57:08 +0000
Received: from bealers ([62.231.132.67])
by pangaea.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0HDvBL03527
for [EMAIL REMOVED] Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:57:11 GMT