Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM Bad Webdesign

date posted 1st February 2002 19:07

>so shite design should be called art?

I never said that.


>This conversation is about "webdesign" not development

I'm making the point that *design* is about making things that work AND look
nice.

Designing something, in my mind, means to create, "fit for a purpose".

Art, on the other hand is not as much purposeful, as entertaining.
You don't *use* a piece of art. (shades of grey people, please....)

Some of the sites put forward as stunning examples of *design* are in fact,
stunning art pieces.

No less value, but not, in my mind, good design.

The level I aspire to is to create a visually stunning web site, overflowing
with content and excellent navigation that is accessible to all.


>Have you never looked at a site that is so visually stunning you think
>F**K -

Yeah, but I'd probably consider it *art* unless I could see it's purpose and
find my way around it easily.


>but don't look down your nose at
>what does not fit into your idea of what makes a good site.


Never, ever, said or did that either.


It's all about semantics, as usual, and email is no medium for discussing
the finer points of anything.

I think that we should be more careful in the future to describe stuff more
accurately.

There is elegant design in simple sites that work well.

What a lot of web designers refer to as great *design* is usually more
artistic than functional. Leading edge Flash experimentation sites are fun
to look at, but usually non-functional.

The more pragmatic contributors on this list and others would praise good
design in a site that works, looks good, and meets the needs of the user,
it's target audience, and the client.

I'm pleased with what I do, it's getting better (IMHO) with every new site I
attempt, but I'm never going to be a leading edge designer, because I don't
have the artistic talent.

I know my place, but it doesn't mean I can't express an opinion.

Feel free to attack my opinion, but please don't attack me.

Thanks for reading

Tony




Messages by Day
February 28th 2002
February 27th 2002
February 26th 2002
February 25th 2002
February 24th 2002
February 23rd 2002
February 22nd 2002
February 21st 2002
February 20th 2002
February 19th 2002
February 18th 2002
February 17th 2002
February 16th 2002
February 15th 2002
February 14th 2002
February 13th 2002
February 12th 2002
February 11th 2002
February 10th 2002
February 9th 2002
February 8th 2002
February 7th 2002
February 6th 2002
February 5th 2002
February 4th 2002
February 3rd 2002
February 2nd 2002
February 1st 2002


Messages by Month
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000