|
|
 |
Re: FN-FORUM OT - specialty - and other stuff ....
date posted 8th September 2002 02:57
Paul J White wrote:
>>>>Unfortunately the US language still retains alot of the olde english
>>>>spellings of 300 years ago. What's better: a language that is truer to
>>>>the "traditional" or one that has evolved?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Ask me one on sport...
>>>Paul.
>>
>>Three at the back or a flat back four?
>>
>
> A language that has evolved but is true to, and in touch with, its roots is
> eminently preferable to three at the back and wingbacks who can either not
> tackle or not cross. I don't think it works for England and it certainly
> doesn't for the toon. Meanwhile Scotland again plumbed the depths of
> international football as they scraped a draw against the Faroe Islands
> today....
>
> Paul.
*lol*
poor scotland...
--
"Nudity bounces between the sublime and the ridiculous..."
the funkyfish collective
[EMAIL REMOVED]
--
|
 |
|