|
|
 |
RE: FN-FORUM [OT] Radar Detectors (Was: Design Critique)
date posted 24th January 2003 16:14
Forget speeders ... I'd cheerfully fire a Stinger missile up the arse of
the under-speeders who chug along at 50 in 60 zones out on the A roads,
when the conditions are perfect and the road's wide and empty and if
they're not in a hurry to get to their destination then it's only fair
that every poor bastard behind them shouldn't be in a hurry either,
Hutch
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED]
[EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Carla Boulton
Sent: 24 January 2003 15:50
To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: Re: FN-FORUM [OT] Radar Detectors (Was: Design Critique)
And while we're on prat, can anyone tell me why it's so important to
talk on
the phone whilst driving?
Carla
on 24/1/03 3:12 pm, Andrew Wilson at [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:
> why not just stop being a prat and drive responsibly - within the
speed
> limits?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL REMOVED]
> [EMAIL REMOVED] Behalf Of Raymond Stone
> Sent: 24 January 2003 10:56
> To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
> Subject: RE: FN-FORUM [OT] Radar Detectors (Was: Design Critique)
>
>
>> Anything that actively detects speed cameras is illegal to use in
this
> country. It's legal to posses
>> one (therefore sell and buy), but if you act on the information it
> gives you, then you've broken the law.
>> Get caught and it'll be confiscated.
>
> Bollocks. It is illegal to have a device that BLOCKS the speed cameras
> radar, it is NOT illegal to use a detector, it was BELIEVED to have
been
========
Freelancers and Freelance Jobs: http://www.freelancers.net
Advertise with Freelancers.net http://www.freelancers.net/advert.php
To unsubscribe please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]
If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]
|
 |
|