Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: [OT] Speed cameras and speed camera detectors

date posted 1st June 2003 10:07

Tony Jones wrote:
> James Fidell wrote:
>
>>Then why do fewest accidents happen where the speed limits are highest?
>>
>
> Well ....... that's probably because it's a relatively safe, hazard free
> section of road ..... hence the higher permissible speed limit :)
>
> However, referring to Ray McGinty's post:
>
>>Speed limits aren't there to spoil your day or to increase police
>>revenue, but to make roads safer for everyone (not just drivers).

This is an interesting question, that was anwered when my girlfriend was
sent on an "speed awareness training course" as an alternative to being
busted. She went off to the course as anyone would, feeling rather
cynical about it, but she came back as a much wiser and safer driver.

Basically, speed limits are mainly applied according to the chance of
vehicles hitting each other head on (other factors such as pedestrian
density also count, but not nearly as much). Apparently most road
fatalities occur due to head-ons - your boy racer who loses control,
leaves the road, and simply collides with the environment has a much
greater chance of survival. Sure, you've got your crumple zones, seat
belts, and airbags, but the human body can only withstand so many G's
before internal organs and blood vessels are torn apart. The forces
experienced when decelerating from 60 mph to zero by hitting an
immovable object are survivable. This is equivalent to two cars
colliding head on. As the cumulative speeds of two colliding vehicles
exceeds 70mph, death due to becomes almost inevitable.

A speed limit on a road is effectively a gamble - how frequently will
two cars collide head on, on a particular stretch of road? To put it
another way, let's say you can tolerate 0.2 fatalities a year (i.e. 1
every five years) on a given stretch of road. What speed limit needs to
be applied to meet this target? For example, on a motorway, the traffic
is segregated, there's a miniscule chance that you'll hit anything going
the other way, so the limit is 70mph.

If anyone wants to argue or to know more, I'm afraid I can't oblige, as
I only know what I was told. Also, before anyone starts quibbling about
G forces, I'm guessing that Jensen Button hitting a tyrewall is not the
same as a head on collision between two road vehicles.

Chrid

--
http://www.chridmeister.co.uk



Messages by Day
June 30th 2003
June 29th 2003
June 28th 2003
June 27th 2003
June 26th 2003
June 25th 2003
June 24th 2003
June 23rd 2003
June 22nd 2003
June 21st 2003
June 20th 2003
June 19th 2003
June 18th 2003
June 17th 2003
June 16th 2003
June 15th 2003
June 14th 2003
June 13th 2003
June 12th 2003
June 11th 2003
June 10th 2003
June 9th 2003
June 8th 2003
June 7th 2003
June 6th 2003
June 5th 2003
June 4th 2003
June 3rd 2003
June 2nd 2003
June 1st 2003


Messages by Month
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000