Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: Dedicated linux hosting query

date posted 20th August 2003 21:13

Bill Martin [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:

> Today is the last day on last years contract, tomorrow is the new one
> which I have yet to pay, and today I received an email from the compan=
y,
> saying that I have reached the upper limit of their current package an=
d
> lately,

That's lovely of them, giving you plenty of time to ponder alternative
options eh?

> it has begun to use more than its allocated number of
> connections; at times it has used over 100 simultaneous connections bl=
ah
> blah. I should reduce the connections or consider a dedicated server.=


I guess they're talking about simultaneous database connections. I can
kind of see their point (but not their technique of encouraging an upgrad=
e),
if you're on a shared server and using quite a lot of shared resource.

Although, I'm sure MySQL and PostgreSQL should go up to 500 simultaneous
connections or more if suitably configured (maybe they are running with
defaults - I tuned ours to start off with a maximum of 250).

> Their dedicated server starts at a scary =A32250 / year which is a huge=
leap
> in cost, which I'm not best pleased about. However I knew that the tim=
e
> to upgrade was inevitable. My current bandwidth is about 10Gig a mont=
h.
> The limit of the dedicated server is about 40Gig a month.

> So, to the point at last... *Does this seem like a reasonable upgrade =
or
> is it massive overkill? I don't like the cost, but I've had a quick l=
ook
> round and it doesn't seem to bad, but I need to have a more extensive
> look, I could have done with more notice from them!

With 100 simultaneous database connections I wouldn't say it's overkill t=
o
move it to a dedicated server. Overkill depends on what spec server you'=
re
getting for the above price and how much bandwidth, you should be able to=
get
a dedicated server for half that price that can handle that kind of load =
easily.

I could sort you out with a (UK hosted - not US) server for half that pri=
ce. :)

We're planning on launching our low spec budget 500 quid/year servers in =
a few
weeks. :)

> *Also there was a website which was basically a forum about web hosting=

> (in the UK?) I seem to remember, any ideas?

http://www.webhostchat.co.uk/

-Paul-

-- =

Paul Civati www.xensia.net
Xensia, London UK - Quality UK Hosting Services



Messages by Day
August 31st 2003
August 30th 2003
August 29th 2003
August 28th 2003
August 27th 2003
August 26th 2003
August 25th 2003
August 24th 2003
August 23rd 2003
August 22nd 2003
August 21st 2003
August 20th 2003
August 19th 2003
August 18th 2003
August 17th 2003
August 16th 2003
August 15th 2003
August 14th 2003
August 13th 2003
August 12th 2003
August 11th 2003
August 10th 2003
August 9th 2003
August 8th 2003
August 7th 2003
August 6th 2003
August 5th 2003
August 4th 2003
August 3rd 2003
August 2nd 2003
August 1st 2003


Messages by Month
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


Messages by Year
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000