Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: OT Austrailian scam phonecalls

date posted 27th January 2004 14:27

On Monday 26 Jan 2004 10:40 pm, Bob Gentle wrote:
> Seems it's not a hoax or an urban myth afterall

Bob, there is *no* *way* that pressing 9 during an incoming=20
phone call can automatically incur premium rate charges, or=20
make a reverse call.

If you wish to argue otherwise can I beg of you to take it
up with the experts in uk.telecom. Meanwhile here is a=20
recent post from there... and for those who can't be arsed=20
to read the whole thing, the relevant statement from BT is:

"Pressing the nine button in the course of the incoming call=20
has no effect on the nature of the BT telephony and can have=20
no direct impact on the BT bill."


From: Andy Key [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: Re: Hoax e-mail on recorded mnessages calls?
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Date: 2003-12-14 15:56:30 PST

In message [EMAIL REMOVED] Linus Surguy=20
[EMAIL REMOVED] writes

>It is certainly true that the 'hoax' warning of =A320/min is an old one=20
>that hasbeen doing the rounds at least a year now. Whilst it is possible=
=20
>to incur charges on international reverse calling, I would doubt that=20
>this is the case here. In addition, you certainly cannot incur premium=20
>rate charges on an incoming call.=20
>
>Once again, this doesnt you cannot receive an invoice for 'time' - there=
=20
>was a scam about a year ago with a third party company sending out bills=
=20
>that looked like BT bills at a high rate for using their services, which=
=20
>were on a 020 London number - but this was a standard invoicing scam, an=
d=20
>only indirectly something to do with the telephone system.
>
>However, recently in the news there has been a lot about US telemarketer=
s=20
>now starting to plunder the UK as they can do this without any tedious=20
>regulation. I suspect they may well use sequential diallers and other=20
>frowned upon techniques.
>
>
>If so, then it wouldnt surprise me if they used press '9' as a way of=20
>breaking you out to a real operator to hard sell the product - but no ot=
her
>unpleasantness, and I'm sure thats what the people who have received cal=
ls
>have had.
>
>Combine this with the old =A320/min PRS scam hoax and you have a wonderf=
ul new
>story to play on people's paranoia.


Sounds like your guess may be pretty accurate. Here's the response I got=20
from BT when I asked about the automated phonecall I received. Make of=20
it what you will.

"Dear Mr Key,

"Thank you for your e-mail regarding the recorded message that you have=20
received.

"I am sorry to hear that you have received a recorded message and the=20
story is being checked in detail by BT Wholesale Fraud Management who=20
currently believe that although there really is a telephone scam in=20
operation which is the basis of this warning, the warning does not=20
accurately describe the way the scam operates.

"BT Wholesale Fraud Management have given us the following comments on=20
the scam warning:

"BT is aware of this matter and has been investigating, it appears that=20
the warning Email may have caused more concern than the actual phone=20
calls themselves. Most of what is in the Email is actually supposition=20
- myth. Pressing the nine button in the course of the incoming call=20
has no effect on the nature of the BT telephony and can have no direct=20
impact on the BT bill.

"It is thought that there are two possible scenarios that could be=20
occurring in relation to these incoming phone calls which I have=20
confirmed do originate in USA..

"1) Having recently obtaining a recording of the actual incoming phone=20
call we know that this is in a marketing call. The call informs the=20
recipient of a number of holiday 'offers' including the prices and=20
mentions that there are limited 'free' offers if you press 9 now. We=20
believe that pressing the 9 engages a sales agent to enter the call and=20
complete the sales pitch. Clearly that happens at and through the=20
equipment of the calling organisation. (incidentally the free holiday=20
cruise is only on offer to the first 100 customers and is dependant on=20
the purchase of a one week holiday @ =A3149 per person)

"2) There is still a small possibility that some of these calls (WE=20
have only heard this one message so far) could be part of a THIRD PARTY=20
BILLED premium service. There is no proof at this stage that this is=20
the case. If it were then we feel that the pressing of the 9 button=20
might be intended to infer some form of the recipient's acceptance re=20
terms and conditions of the call. This, plus the apparent need for=20
postcode etc may enable the 3rd party biller to argue consent and=20
justify billing. In such a scenario these charges would be billed=20
totally independently of BT and would probably require the 3rd party=20
biller to ring again in order to obtain, from the recipient, their name=20
/ address details for the bill.

"We would urge customers to exercise the usual caution. Do not give out=20
any personal details unless you are certain the request for information=20
is legitimate. If you are not 100 per cent sure that the call is bona=20
fide, hang up. We are not aware of any complaints from customers who=20
have actually been billed as a result of these calls.

"Furthermore we believe calls of this nature may be in breach of=20
automatic calling equipment regulations (ACE) and would urge anyone=20
affected to report the matter to Ofcom, the communications industry=20
regulator.

"These calls originate from outside the UK and BT (and other service=20
providers) cannot prevent it happening.

"I hope this information has been useful to you."



Messages by Day
January 31st 2004
January 30th 2004
January 29th 2004
January 28th 2004
January 27th 2004
January 26th 2004
January 25th 2004
January 24th 2004
January 23rd 2004
January 22nd 2004
January 21st 2004
January 20th 2004
January 19th 2004
January 18th 2004
January 17th 2004
January 16th 2004
January 15th 2004
January 14th 2004
January 13th 2004
January 12th 2004
January 11th 2004
January 10th 2004
January 9th 2004
January 8th 2004
January 7th 2004
January 6th 2004
January 5th 2004
January 4th 2004
January 3rd 2004
January 2nd 2004
January 1st 2004


Messages by Month
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000