Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: secure sites, encryption etc

date posted 3rd August 2004 20:12

nick b wrote:

> Dom Latter wrote:
>> 2, disallow root login, only allow one username to SSH in,

Use cert-based authentication - don't allow any passwords. Agree with
the rest.

>> Oh, and consider using OpenBSD.

Seconded.

> considering. may not be an option though. is it much better than FreeBSD?

For security, yes - lots. However, there are drawbacks to it - e.g. it
can't do SMP yet (tho it looks like the next version might), and it
isn't as fast.

>> Have you got a specific problem or are you just doing research out of
>> interest?
>>
> no specifics yet - no server, no application, no database. So early
> planning stages still, but security is one of the prime considerations
> for viability of the whole thing.

Well, if it's that important then you need to look at using something
other than Apache too (see the OBSD mailing list for why).

> Would you advise encrypting data and/or database content (I'm looking at
> PHP's mcrypt module) even with all the best practices for security of
> the server? Isn't that what's done with c/card numbers usually?

Depends. The problem with encrypting data on a server is that the server
has to be able to read it, so by definition it's already got the key.
You really need to work out what you're trying to protect the data from
before you can decide if you need to encrypt it.

I'd suggest you go with another server that runs nothing but PostgeSQL,
and do *all* database access via stored procedures - that's probably
good enough for what you're after without encrypting everything. If not,
there are ways to make it more secure, but they get very expensive very
quickly.

Anyway, feel free to give me a shout off-list.

-C



Messages by Day
August 31st 2004
August 30th 2004
August 29th 2004
August 28th 2004
August 27th 2004
August 26th 2004
August 25th 2004
August 24th 2004
August 23rd 2004
August 22nd 2004
August 21st 2004
August 20th 2004
August 19th 2004
August 18th 2004
August 17th 2004
August 16th 2004
August 15th 2004
August 14th 2004
August 13th 2004
August 12th 2004
August 11th 2004
August 10th 2004
August 9th 2004
August 8th 2004
August 7th 2004
August 6th 2004
August 5th 2004
August 4th 2004
August 3rd 2004
August 2nd 2004
August 1st 2004


Messages by Month
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000