Re: FN-FORUM: Site check

date posted 21st January 2006 10:35

Why would I pay =A31 for a budget photo when I can get one for $1 here:

http://www.istockphoto.com/
http://www.dreamstime.com/

?

Both sites have a huge range of photos, better design than your site =20
and more features.

Wouldn't it be better to cut your prices to, say $0.30 for low res =20
and $1 for high res?

That way I'd have a reason to get photos from your site over theirs.

Rich Quick
http://www.richardquickdesign.com



On 21 Jan 2006, at 10:11, David J MacKillican wrote:

>
> Hi all
>
> I have a site which is due for launch shortly, I think it is fine =20
> and has
> been checked both on a Mac and PC.
>
> Could you have a look and send your comments.
>
> Site is http://www.budgetphotos.net/.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
> David J MacKillican
> http://www.djmwebservices.com your business open 24 hours
>
> Telephone: 01249 701194
> Mobile: 07973194834
> Facsimile: 01249 713501
>
> The information contained in or attached to this email is intended =20
> only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If =20
> you are not
> the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it =20
> to the
> intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not =20
> disclose, copy,
> distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. It may contain
> information which is confidential and/or covered by legal =20
> professional or
> other privilege (or other rules or laws with similar effect in =20
> jurisdictions
> outside England and Wales).
>
>
>
> --=20
> Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
> Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
> and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
>
> To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
>
>