Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: activation code for photoshop

date posted 19th August 2007 13:56

From: "Mark Pawelek" [EMAIL REMOVED]
> The police are not interested in investigating copyright violations by
> individuals and such violations are not theft. The police would only be
> interested if the copyright violation involved selling counterfeited
> goods.
> (copyright violations carried out for profit such that Adobe are deprived
> of
> a legitimate sales)
>
> Daniel may be a fool but he isn't likely to attract the attention of the
> police.

As a comment on the general conduct of the Police, that is true.
Unfortunately, it makes available on a public forum that professional
freelance developers appear to hold that view.

Here are few points...

1. Software theft is theft of property.
2. It is generally regarded as a civil matter with organisations such
FAST dealing with it (http://www.fast.org.uk/typesofsofttheft.asp).
3. Scots law deals with property as an essential issue both in civil and
criminal law, not a side issue. In England, the Theft Act applies for
criminal issues, that and common law for civil issues. The subject matter
set out on this thread is one of both criminal and civil law - as such it is
a Police matter should they care to deal with it AND the Procurator Fiscal
decides it is in the public interest to prosecute.
4. Many list members here and on the "sister" list have sacrificed a lot
of years and late nights in learning and gaining experience to the level
they can earn their living from professional Web services. They and their
families depend on income from their professional development pursuits. This
topic calls into question the ethics of Web developers here and generally.
As such it tarnishes the ethics of professional Web folk.
5. In the circumstances, it is right and helpful to debate the issue of
IPR theft, especially when, as put forward by the original poster, the forum
is used as a vehicle for advancing distribution of, or communicating, IPR
theft devices. That the Police are not interested in or have inadequate
resources to deal with such crime may be an issue, but if it is the case
then other developers are correct in pointing out that the majority here
have higher ethics than to condone or participate in criminal activity.
6. If the original poster made a mistake during his path towards becoming
an ethical Web professional, that's okay. Others here have assisted.

No summary, just points in a somewhat distasteful thread
.

Mike A.




Messages by Day
August 31st 2007
August 30th 2007
August 29th 2007
August 28th 2007
August 27th 2007
August 26th 2007
August 25th 2007
August 24th 2007
August 23rd 2007
August 22nd 2007
August 21st 2007
August 20th 2007
August 19th 2007
August 18th 2007
August 17th 2007
August 16th 2007
August 15th 2007
August 14th 2007
August 13th 2007
August 12th 2007
August 11th 2007
August 10th 2007
August 9th 2007
August 8th 2007
August 7th 2007
August 6th 2007
August 5th 2007
August 4th 2007
August 3rd 2007
August 2nd 2007
August 1st 2007


Messages by Month
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000