Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM: This collective/cooperative/consortium thing

date posted 18th September 2007 14:01

Yay - good to have the forum back. Now to pick up at Ian's last posting ..
any comments?

Ian Piper wrote:
>>> - Who organises/handles/pays for overheads?
>>> - Online/offline advertising/marketing, development/
>>> maintenance/ hosting
>>> of the co-op website, co-op accounts/financial management.
>>
>> This could mean setting up a company with share holders and
>> directors. Would independant freelance people want to do this?

> This is why I was interested in understanding whether a collective
> or cooperative model might work better than a more traditional
> approach. I'm sure many of you have been round the track on this
> before, and have probably seen initiatives founder on the rocks of
> organisational structures, formal roles and management
> responsibilities. I don't think I would want to form a new company,
> or to have employment contracts and all that paraphernalia.

> I just want a way for people with complementary skills to be able
> to identify each other, build a portfolio team that covers the
> requirements and club together to bid for work. Is there a way for
> professionals to work under the umbrella, as it were, of a
> collective body without it having to be a limited company?

> On the question of who identifies work and who manages it, could
> that be a shared responsibility? I have usually found that the
> most effective teams work as collaborators and partners rather
> than in formal management relationships.

> Regarding how you reward the participants, I have no idea. When I
> have worked with other small companies in the past we have tended
> to divide the overall contract value according to some sort of
> estimate of the proportion of the deliverables that each would be
> providing.

Tam wrote:
> Chris is a good buddy of mine. Talk to him almost daily on msn,
> and i've been getting a bit of a commentary on his experience
> with grow. Also, im not entirely sure if hes still on this list
> or not.

Tam - did Chris have any comments on his experience with Grow?

Cheers, Ben

--
Ben Johnson, Neogic Web Solutions
// design . development . managed hosting

w | http://www.neogic.com
t | +44 (0)1242 808 262
e | [EMAIL REMOVED]







Messages by Day
September 30th 2007
September 29th 2007
September 28th 2007
September 27th 2007
September 26th 2007
September 25th 2007
September 24th 2007
September 23rd 2007
September 22nd 2007
September 21st 2007
September 20th 2007
September 19th 2007
September 18th 2007
September 17th 2007
September 16th 2007
September 15th 2007
September 14th 2007
September 13th 2007
September 12th 2007
September 11th 2007
September 10th 2007
September 9th 2007
September 8th 2007
September 7th 2007
September 6th 2007
September 5th 2007
September 4th 2007
September 3rd 2007
September 2nd 2007
September 1st 2007


Messages by Month
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000