|
|
 |
RE: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator
date posted 22nd September 2007 21:57
The w3c validator misses things does it? Thats terrible that is.
Considering it's the w3c that lay down the standards of how we should be
developing websites.
Personally, I make sure all my sites are HTML and CSS. You'll tend to find
that most of the bigger organisations don't bother. Banks are the worst
offenders.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Martin
Wheatley
Sent: 21 September 2007 13:42
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: Re: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator
On 21/09/2007 13:23, Paul Cooper wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the general opinion of trying to validate sites with the W3C
> validator. Amazon comes up with over 1000 errors. Even Google has 33
> errors.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
Personally I think it's terrible, it misses loads of errors :)
http://www.htmlvalidator.com/ is what I use, you can get a plugin for
firefox too.
Martin
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
|
 |
|