RE: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator

date posted 22nd September 2007 22:17

Ye i hate seeing a website that doesn't stick to standards especially when
they can afford it to be done right, i was reading in google seo book that
having validated code helps your ranking, interesting lol. Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Aidan
Sent: 22 September 2007 22:37
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: RE: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator


The w3c validator misses things does it? Thats terrible that is.
Considering it's the w3c that lay down the standards of how we should be
developing websites.
Personally, I make sure all my sites are HTML and CSS. You'll tend to find
that most of the bigger organisations don't bother. Banks are the worst
offenders.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Martin
Wheatley
Sent: 21 September 2007 13:42
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: Re: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator


On 21/09/2007 13:23, Paul Cooper wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the general opinion of trying to validate sites with the W3C
> validator. Amazon comes up with over 1000 errors. Even Google has 33
> errors.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>

Personally I think it's terrible, it misses loads of errors :)

http://www.htmlvalidator.com/ is what I use, you can get a plugin for
firefox too.

Martin

--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.

To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html


--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.

To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html