|
|
 |
RE: FN-FORUM: Prosperity4
date posted 24th September 2007 12:01
ah, sorry mate i should have explained my self better !
basicly an umbrella company such as orange genie will do all your accounts for you when you work as a contractor or freelancer.
it basicly means you dont have to hire an accountant to do your pay roll.
they take a small fee out of your wages and in return they do all your accounts and supply you with a payslip for each payment.
in the past i've used an accountant and i can honestly say that using orange genie costs less and takes much less time.
all you need to do is fill in the electronic time sheets on their site and depending on your employer send them signed copies of timesheets etc... and hey presto you get paid.
OG always invoice without you having to ask them and they do it the day they receive your timesheet. they also waste no time in running your payroll once they receive the wages from your employer.
if you submit receipts for all your expenses you get very good tax breaks with them that you will ntoice on each payslip.
prosperity 4 promise this but DO NOT DELIVER.
P4 are PURE EVIL !!!
OG makes life good :)
Thanks for the advice about Propserity4, but what exactly is the benefit of
using a scompany like them or Orange Genie? What do they actually do for you?
Regards
Phill Healey
Munklefish
Po Box 70
Manchester
M34 3SQ
T: 0161 408 4759
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL REMOVED]
Sent: 24 September 2007 12:12
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: RE: FN-FORUM: Prosperity4
for the love of god please do not use Prosperity 4.
Use Orange Genie / Genie World.
Ive been using them for nearly 5 years and they are 100% reliable and on the
ball.
I tried prosperity 4 for one project and they took 6 months to pay me.
They kept my P45 3 months longer than the legal limit.
they are so bad that some employers refuse to use contractors who are with
prosperity 4.
apparantly they have recently gone bust also ... or are in the process of
closing down or something.
do yourself a big favour mate and avoid them like the plague. theres nothing
like working hard all month to find you are not getting paid !
Hi,
Im new to the whole self-employed thing... What is Prosperity4 & does
anybody use / recommend them?
Regards
Phill Healey
Munklefish: multimedia for the masses
Po Box 70
Manchester
M34 3SQ
T: 0161 408 4759
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Sam M -
www.wiredeyes.com
Sent: 24 September 2007 11:51
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: RE: FN-FORUM: Opinions on W3C validator
The answer to this question is not if YOU are for validation necessarily,
it's more are your clients for validation or not, the fact is more a more
clients are asking for W3C validated sites, heard it is a good thing and so
want it.
These days I just bang "W3C valid code" on all quotes even though I know in
most cases the client has no idea what it actually means and that in most
cases the site won't be W3C compliant.
Problem is 90% of my sites are CMS driven and so validating code on user
generated content is more or less impossible so I end up explaining to the
customer that the CMS template is W3C compliant but their content isn't and
it is not possible to have a W3C valid site if they also want a WYSIWYG CMS
editor. It's also a good way to up sell my content mark-up services. :)
Regards
Sam Morgan
WiredEyes Media / ServWise Advanced Hosting
tel (Uk): +44 (0)20 7100 2178
tel (Italy): +39 070 773 6543
web : www.wiredeyes.com / www.servwise.com
----
umop ap!sdn w,! aw dlaH
----
==========================
Summer Sale 50% off all ServWise
hosting, use coupon code : HALFPRICE
==========================
> -----Original Message-----
>
> On 24 Sep 2007, at 11:16, Paul Cooper wrote:
>
> >
> > On 23 Sep 2007 13:06:39 -0000, Tony Crockford
> > [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:
> >
> >> On 21 Sep 2007, at 13:22, Paul Cooper wrote:
> >>> Amazon comes up with over 1000 errors. Even Google has 33
> >>> errors.
> >>
> >> not sure of the point you're trying to make?
> >>
> > The point I'm making is that very few (I couldn't actually find any)
> > well know brands have web sites that validate. Therefore I'm
> assuming
> > it's not something to worry about.
>
> I disagree.
>
> Internet Explorer is the most widely used browser, but it doesn't
> adhere to standards.
>
> saying it's okay not to validate just because lots of big sites don't
> is not a forward thinking standards advocating web professional way
> of thinking.
>
> ;o)
>
> you're either for standards or not. if you are *for* then you
> validate your code against those standards.
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
|
|
|
