|
|
 |
Re: FN-FORUM: The rules
date posted 15th November 2007 14:32
Dom Latter wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007 14:55:14 Gary Short wrote:
>
>> Online communities such as this one, are self organising. Its not for you
>> (or anyone else for matter) to say what this forum is for and what it isn't
>> for. The community as a whole will decide what is appropriate and what is
>
> I agree.
>
> The long-established consensus is that pimping for work is not appropriate.
>
Hi all,
I picked this one to reply to having now recovered my sense of humour,
and equinamity.
I apologise If I caused offense, to anyone.
I live alone most of the time, and I would't ever kick the puppy, so
sometimes I just boil over into other areas.
I do feel that "the rules" are important, The WAUK list split off from
the freelancers list and I made a concious decision to stay with this
list. The rules for posting on the WAUK list were derived from the
freelancers list consensus, at the time of that split, and has one of
the most coherent posts on the subject of top posting I have ever read.
I would ask that all contributors take the time to read the rules for
posting, and they then should feel to break as many many of them as
they see fit.
This is the internet after all.
Cheers
Carrie
PS My question right now is :
How do I get Thunderbird to stop losing the dictionary every time it
updates?
|
 |
|