Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: Representing art on the web

date posted 18th March 2008 14:40

Lee Rickler wrote:
>
> Then you either:
> View the CSS - image path
> Use FF web developer - images > view images
> Use Safari - Activity - view image path
> Do a screen grab
>
> Believe me, the only way to stop anyone stealing anything online is to
> not put it online.
Yes I know, but I suppose I was thinking in terms of tripping up the
casual surfer who might think "Ooo, that looks nice, I'll just take a
copy of it and put it up on my website." Having discovered that it would
take a tiny bit more thought then maybe they wouldn't bother. But I
admit I have no idea what sort of person would want to nick art from a
website and such a method might indeed be laughably simple.

Vicki

>
> Lee Rickler
> Director - Point and Stare - pointandstare.com
> Web Design and Development for over 11 years
>
> Vicki Sivess wrote:
>>
>> John Wooding wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I've got an art gallery site to work on and am trying to resolve two
>>> concerns : that art images be honest representations, and that the
>>> images shown should not be exact copies.
>>>
>>> Watermarking is only for those with large funds to chase the
>>> thieves. Superimposing a gallery logo might detract from the
>>> impression of
>>> the image.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how to subtly alter images captured so that what
>>> is displayed on the site is an honest representation without being
>>> an exact representation?
>>>
>>> John
>> Sorry, I don't have a link, but I remember reading about a technique
>> whereby you make the proper image the background to an image and then
>> make the source of the image a transparent image so that it sits on
>> top without anyone knowing. Then when someone does a copy image,
>> they'll just get the transparent image.
>>
>> Vicki
>>
>>
>



Messages by Day
March 31st 2008
March 30th 2008
March 29th 2008
March 28th 2008
March 27th 2008
March 26th 2008
March 25th 2008
March 24th 2008
March 23rd 2008
March 22nd 2008
March 21st 2008
March 20th 2008
March 19th 2008
March 18th 2008
March 17th 2008
March 16th 2008
March 15th 2008
March 14th 2008
March 13th 2008
March 12th 2008
March 11th 2008
March 10th 2008
March 9th 2008
March 8th 2008
March 7th 2008
March 6th 2008
March 5th 2008
March 4th 2008
March 3rd 2008
March 2nd 2008
March 1st 2008


Messages by Month
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000